Should We Choose the Next President by the Health Conditions Alone? By Summer Banks
July 2nd, 2008The candidates for President of the United States are set and now, we, the people, have a choice to make. Will we choose the fresh candidate with lofty ideas and a stellar heart or the seasoned candidate with years of experience and a more traditional outlook on the Presidency? We have listened to the campaign promises and understand the visions these candidates seek to fulfill, but what about their health and the effect their health has on our nation. Each candidate presents a unique set of health conditions. Should these conditions be taken into consideration when choosing who will rule of nation? Before making that final decision, let us first take a look at the past.
When I was in nursing school, I was presented with a philanthropic decision of medical nature. One day in class during my second year of school we were given a project to complete as a group. The project consisted of giving away one heart. There were three candidates for the heart, and like our Presidential candidates, they each presented a unique set of health conditions.
The first candidate was an 89 year old Caucasian woman who was in good health and simply needed a heart transplant. There were no extensive medical problems, but her age was a factor in the decision.
The second candidate was a 55 year old Caucasian man who had been, and still was, a heavy drinker. The man needed a heart transplant, but also suffered from cirrhosis of the liver.
The third candidate was a 22 year old student at the Harvard School of medicine. The student was Bi-racial and afflicted with HIV.
Given each candidates unique set of health considerations, who would you choose? The answer of my group changed my perception of my peers for the rest of my life.
Before revealing the choices made, let us take a look at the Presidential candidates and their health conditions.
John McCain has suffered from recurring skin cancer three times. He has suffered from an enlarged prostate and was a smoker for 45 years, but remains smoke free today. He is a man of accelerated age and Caucasian race.
Barack Obama has suffered from no known medical conditions. He smoked for several years but has quit within the last 18 months and currently uses Nicorette to stay smoke free. He is of younger years and of Mulatto (½ African American and ½ Caucasian) race. He has a family history of cancer.
So you see, the candidates are very similar to the candidates in the heart transplant assignment. Now, back to the results of the vote on the heart transplant.
There were 10 people in the group of nursing students voting on who would receive the one heart. All of the voters chose the 89 year old woman, aside from me. There rationale, the 22 year old suffered from cirrhosis and continued to drink, so the heart would go to waste with him. The 35 year old medical student was going to die of HIV anyway, so why give him the heart?
The nursing students took the route of safety. They chose the candidate that posed the least risk and thus, felt safe in giving her the heart. But, sometimes risk is needed to create change. Looking into the future brings new light to the result of each heart transplant.
The 22 year old man, if given the heart, would have lived for another 3 years and died of cirrhosis of the liver. The 89 year old female lived for another year and died in her sleep from old age. The 35 year old medical student, he went on to complete Harvard Medical School and find the cure for HIV / AIDS. So, who did I choose? I chose the 35 year old medical student.
The point to make here is simple. Sometimes when choosing who will receive the heart of the nation, there are points to be considered beyond the medical aspect of life. Just because one Presidential candidate appears to be the safest medical bet, does not necessarily mean they will make the most of the heart you have given them. Our world, our nation, our lives depend upon the choices we make when voting for our next President. How will you decide?






